At
first, I expected this reading to be similar to the other sections which
emphasized the racial aspects of the foster care system. I was surprised Roberts took a slightly
different angle by proposing the metaphor of the system being a pendulum either
toward the parental rights or the child’s rights. This allowed her to present a different angle
on the problems within foster care. What
I found most interesting was the conflicting goals of the child welfare
system. Roberts cites Richard Gelles in
support of this argument. He proclaims, “the
basic flaw of the child protection system is that it has two inherently
contradictory goals: protecting children and preserving families” (107). I partially agree with this claim in
situation where the child should not be returned home. However if a child were better at home, this
would both protect the home and preserve families. His statement seems to imply that in order to
protect children they must be separated from their families.
Also, I found it interesting the
high incentives the government rewards agencies who have a certain number of
children adopted. This is reminiscent of
the Nelson article in which she emphasized children in adoption as a
commodity. There are serious ethical
issues because the child’s well-being may be compromised for the agency’s
profit. In addition, this gives the agency
motivation to not reunite the family even if it is the better option. I can see this shift toward having children
being adopted cause an even greater overload in the foster care system. There are only so many people who are willing
to adopt in the U.S. and even less that are willing to adopt from foster
care. These children may just become
lost in the system rather than being returned to homes in which they are
greatly wanted.
Lastly, I was surprised that simply
being in the foster care system for a certain amount of time was reason enough
to terminate parental rights. The list
of ridiculous tasks seems to show agencies placing irrational standards on
parents. I wonder what Minnesota’s time
frame is for termination of parental rights.
A good discussion question based on this issue is:
Is it ethical for parental rights
to be terminated based solely on the time their child is in the foster care
system?
Reanna N.

No comments:
Post a Comment