Initially it would seem inevitable that feminist
organizations and groups of birthmothers from the “baby scoop” era would have
countless things in common, however, after reading about the interactions between
CUB and NOW in Solinger’s work Claiming Rights in the Era of Choice, it becomes clear that
their beliefs were extremely different. At the start of the birthmother
revolution in the 1970’s, it became commonplace for newly active birthmothers
to join in on their local feminist movements. After voicing their opinions in
these circumstances though, it quickly became clear that their battles were
completely different and separated from those involved in the feminist
movements. Those involved in the feminist movement and members of NOW were
concerned not with the rights of birthmothers, but the rights of women to not
become mothers through controlling their reproduction through contraceptives
and abortion. Feminists were advocating for a women’s right not to be forced
into motherhood, which was the opposite of what birthmothers were fighting for
(Solinger, 117). The lack in
agreement between these two groups came from the lack of understanding of each
position. The feminist movement failed to recognize the implications of
surrendering a child for adoption in the 1950’s and 1960’s, when these women
had no choice. The feminists continued to believe that adoption was a “personal
choice” that both parties made during the adoption and continued to see only
the benefits that women (both birthmothers and adoptive mothers) gained from
their decisions (Solinger, 117). The group of birthmothers that considered their struggles
part of the feminist revolution were not wrong in doing so. Their outcries for
birthmothers’ rights were consistent with those of women’s rights. Both groups
were fighting against discrimination and the freedom of choice. The failure of
these two out-groups to cooperate, however, rested on the lack of knowledge
that feminists possessed about birthmother’s circumstances.
-Aly
Solinger, R. (2001). "Claiming rights in the era
of choice: Part II: Concerned united birthparents," from Beggars and Choosers: How the politics of choice shapes adoption, abortion, and welfare
in the United States. NY: Hill and Wang, p.103-138.
No comments:
Post a Comment